The cited study found that: "people diagnosed with anxiety are less likely to be able to differentiate neutral or "safe" stimuli from threatening ones." Which, I mean, like, duh. A bit more:
The scientists found that those with anxiety experienced lasting plasticity long after an emotional experience (aka a "stimulus") ended. This means the brain was unable to distinguish new, irrelevant situations from something that's familiar or non-threatening, resulting in anxiety. In other words, anxious individuals tend to over-generalize emotional experiences, whether they are threatening or not.
Most importantly, researchers noted, this reaction is not something that an anxious individual can control, because it's a fundamental brain difference.Apparently they found that the participants with anxiety has differences in the amygdala, which is associated with fear.
* Pop-culture aside: amygdala makes me think of medulla-oblongata. *
Anyway, the piece goes on to say that an emotional event can induce brain changes that can then lead to "full-blown anxiety." It seems like something becomes unable to distinguish a given stimulation from something dangerous.
The new research is a sound reminder that a person is hardly responsible for having a mental illness; surmounting evidence shows mental health conditions have genetic and physiological underpinnings. A 2015 study found that anxiety may be hereditary, while other research suggests depression may be an inflammatory disease.I hope research gets more funding, because something tells me we're so close to a breakthrough in treating depression and anxiety. There's a major missing link, in this "modern plague."
No comments:
Post a Comment